At times, Architects may wonder if dealing with other people is even worth the frustration.īut like any personality type, Architects do crave social interaction – they’d just prefer to surround themselves with people who share their values and priorities. As a result, they may inadvertently come across as rude or even offensive when they’re only trying to be honest. This may explain why so many fictional villains are modeled on this personality type.īecause Architects value truth and depth, many common social practices – from small talk to white lies – may seem pointless or downright stupid to them. They tend to prioritize rationality and success over politeness and pleasantries – in other words, they’d rather be right than popular. Social FrustrationsĪrchitects aren’t known for being warm and fuzzy. At times, this lone-wolf behavior can come across as insensitive, as it fails to take into consideration other people’s thoughts, desires, and plans. They also generally feel comfortable making decisions without asking for anyone else’s input. Architects don’t mind acting alone, perhaps because they don’t like waiting around for others to catch up with them. This personality type comes with a strong independent streak. And heaven help anyone who tries to slow them down by enforcing pointless rules or offering poorly thought-out criticism.Īrchitects, independent to the core, want to shake off other people’s expectations and pursue their own ideas.
The architect full#
They bring a single-minded drive to their passion projects, applying the full force of their insight, logic, and willpower. Architects want to be successful, not just inventive. In their quest to find better ways of doing things, they aren’t afraid to break the rules or risk disapproval – in fact, they rather enjoy it.īut as anyone with this personality type would tell you, a new idea isn’t worth anything unless it actually works. But ever-skeptical Architects prefer to make their own discoveries. Many personality types trust the status quo, relying on conventional wisdom and other people’s expertise as they go about their lives. Finding a Better WayĪrchitects question everything. Many Architects are known for their irreverent wit, and beneath their serious exteriors, they often have a sharp, delightfully sarcastic sense of humor. That said, it would be a mistake to stereotype these personalities as dull or humorless. No one is entitled to be ignorant.” Harlan EllisonĪrchitects can be single-minded, with little patience for frivolity, distractions, or idle gossip. You are entitled to your informed opinion. They are confident in their ability to teach themselves about – and master – any topic that interests them, whether that’s coding or capoeira or classical music. In school, people with this personality type may have been called “bookworms” or “nerds.” But rather than taking these labels as insults, many Architects embrace them. But they may be cynical about human nature more generally, assuming that most people are lazy, unimaginative, or simply doomed to mediocrity.Īrchitects derive much of their self-esteem from their knowledge and mental acuity. Architects believe that, through willpower and intelligence, they can achieve even the most challenging of goals. This argument overcomes the opposition between natural and cultural determination, and enables us to comprehend the continuity of the evolutionary process as the result of a dynamic interplay between distinct social and physical domains of both human and animal existence.These personalities can be both the boldest of dreamers and the bitterest of pessimists. Culture divorced from social purpose is practically inert: as an instrumental apparatus, working in intimate conjunction with the executive equipment of the body, culture is neither the initiator nor the consequence of production but the vehicle by which it is carried on. Likewise I distinguish the social from the cultural. By separating the purpose of action from the manner of its conduct, human nature can be related to morality. Two views of the 'social' are contrasted: as an aspect of the instrumental behaviour by which a natural purpose is implemented as the source of conscious purpose, executed through a set of natural instruments amplified in man by culture.
Intentionality of action is located in the social domain. A mechanistic view of animal existence is rejected: if man is both an objective part of the physical world and a subjective agent acting intentionally upon it, the same must be said at least of all higher animals. This lecture attempts to answer the question 'do animals work?' It is suggested that consciously directed or purposive action is not necessarily that which is guided by a symbolic blueprint.